Friday, 21 February 2014

Clean air and water… Whatever next? Ozone Therapy?

“Cure is a 4 letter word, and it belongs to the medical doctors and big pharma."
Aquapurebd.com
An ozone generator… A 'cure' for all ills?
It has become more and more evident that the role of the mainstream media is to deceive the people whilst giving the impression they are providing balanced and well researched information and this couldn’t be much further from the truth.
Most of the time they create so much confusion that people will just abdicate responsibility, accept the deception and go for the government media guidelines. Their lies cover each and every subject, but the one I find particularly insidious is our health.
Not a day goes by when they won’t report something in complete contradiction to what was reported previously, all of course backed up with the analysis of ‘expert’s’. The confusion they create in terms of what we should or shouldn’t eat, the quantity of what we should or shouldn’t drink, the medicine you feel you should be taking, eventually gnaws away little by little at our ability to think for ourselves and is driving us mostly towards the worst options.
Bearing in mind all the advice they so benevolently force feed us with, backed up with figures and comments from their ‘experts’, things are far from getting any better:
The Guardian, 7th June 2013 -
47% of Britons will develop cancer in their lifetime by 2020, study shows, from figures gathered by MacMillans
Could it all be because The Guardian, on 9th May 2013, blatantly published this piece of disinformation with a catchy headline:
"Supermarkets cash in on unfounded fears about food and health’."
“Products that are marketed as being free from GM, aspartame, MSG and parabens perpetuate myths and ignore evidence.”
"We have all found ourselves standing in a supermarket aisle struggling to choose between different versions of the same thing; do I choose the product that is "free from artificial sweetener" or has "no MSG"? What about the one that "contains no GM" or is “paraben-free”?"
Mono Sodium Glutamate… Yum yum
greendeals.org
Mono Sodium Glutamate… Yum yum
MSG is banned in many countries yet we still eat this toxin regularly
"But these are false choices; supermarkets are misinforming their customers about health risks. “There is no scientific evidence to rumours about adverse health effects from the flavour enhancer monosodium glutamate (MSG), or from foods containing material from plants that were genetically modified, or from the sweetener aspartame, or from parabens, which are used to preserve toiletries.”
By marketing products as "free from" supermarkets are playing on people's fears, which are based on the rumours that have circulated about these substances.
Frustrated by this cynical marketing, a group of junior researchers that I coordinate, The Voice of Young Science Network,wrote an open letter which called on supermarkets to stop misleading customers and review their negative claim policies.
I cannot believe the statement in bold!
On the contrary, there is absolutely tons of evidence against MSG, GM food, Aspartame, and Parabens. TONS! But don’t just take my word for it.
A good place to start checking this evidence up would be at www.naturalnews.com - In printing out such outrageous lies the Guardian put busy gullible readers’ lives at risk.
Are those readers not likely to take these articles at face value? Or will they research them? This is highly unlikely, as most people believe what is in the mainstream media without questioning it.
If they don’t, they are entrusting known liars with their health and may find themselves to be part of the 47% that get afflicted with cancer and possibly an added pinch of obesity by 2020 because they’ll have pumped themselves full of crap, in full confidence that the advice the Guardian and the Voice of Young Science has given them was impartial, objective and factual.
It seems to me that this was just another piece of propaganda financed by the industry; the biochemical industry.
Just check up The Voice of Young Sciences (http://www.senseaboutscience.org) and find out about their partners. There are not many farmers in that list!
The article that really made my blood boil was in The Telegraph on the 21st October, 2013
“'Ozone therapy' endangered patient's life, court hears.”
A retired GP put his patient's life at risk performing a 'bizarre' alternative therapy, with no proven benefits, to treat a rare form of non-Hodgkins lymphoma, a tribunal heard.
To fully appreciate the deviousness of this article, you’ll need to read it to the end. I don’t want to spoil your fun but no one got physically hurt in the end and the patient’s life was by no means in danger. Only a bunch of big pharma, puppet, medical ‘experts’ got threatened by the potential of such a simple, cost effective therapy.
I only read this piece of fear mongering very recently, but coincidently, a short time before it was published back in October 2013, for no particular reason, I was recommended to try an ozone generator by two great people, a mother and son team Judy and Des, from the Bolton Freedom Advocate group.
The ozone just happened to pop into the conversation, but I had made it pretty clear that I was open to alternative medicine and even more interested when those alternatives come personally recommended. Judy and Des explained to me that an ozone generator is perfect for purifying the air, water, food, and that it is actually a tried and tested technique, particularly in Germany, but also in many other countries, although banned in some. Hummmm, I wonder why?
Purifying toxic air?
sanitarian.net
Purifying toxic air?
Ozone therapy… worth trying?
In a nutshell, ‘ozone is oxygen but in a different form. It contains three oxygen molecules, not two. The ozone is generated from the cleaned oxygen by electrical discharge just like lightning. By splitting the oxygen and creating single molecules, the single molecules can attach to oxygen (O2) and create O3. The O3 is then discharged into the room.’
In nature, the ozone takes care of the air and removes all the polluted particulates matter from it. This is why, wherever there is pollution, ozone will also be found. This isn’t because ozone is the problem, like some twisted minds would like us to believe, but because it is the solution to the problem.
Ozone generators can be used to break down pollutants in water sources; they kill bacteria and nasty odours effectively. Thousands of communities around the world have water treatment plants using ozone for their water decontamination.
I already use water filters and a distiller to get rid of all that toxic muck that our local utility company adds to our tap water. But when it comes to air toxicity, it gets more complicated and the ozone has its work cut out, especially with the constant chemtrail spraying of our once blue skies. So, how to clean the air we breathe?
I decided to look a bit more into this ozone therapy and what I found out, and experienced by myself, was so fascinating that I had no option but to share it.
I stumbled upon an old interview of Ed McCabe on Jeff Rense’s radio show. According to him, ozone therapy is 100% safe, natural and cheap.
Ed McCabe says that the first physical cause of all disease is the buildup of toxicity in what we eat, drink, breathe and I guess also what we put on our skin. The air pollution, the food with additives, colouring, flavourings, preservatives, GMO, bacteria, the water’s added fluoride, chloride, and more, are all toxic to our bodies. Our kidneys, liver and colon really struggle keeping up with the cleansing of all this surplus of toxicity and can’t always manage so then our body then needs to produce more white cells to fight it.
The second cause of disease, he advances, is the invasion of the body of bacteria, fungus, viruses and pathogens.
As far as he is concerned ‘Ozone Therapy’ addresses directly those two major causes of all diseases.
He says that 66% of the body is water and that if we eat toxic products our body’s water becomes toxic. Any bacteria entering our bodies see that toxic stuff as food and so they eat it and defecate it. This is gross and makes us ill because we are naturally allergic to the bacteria’s waste product.
Waste products can be broken down into four chemicals, which we can then urinate, defecate, sweat, spit and breathe out; they are hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon and sulphur. The only way these chemicals can come out of our bodies is to be combined with oxygen.
Hydrogen + oxygen = water
Carbon + oxygen = carbon dioxide
Nitrogen + oxygen + sulphur + oxygen become by-products of the oxidation mechanism of the human body, which then disposes of it.
Ozone therapy gives an extra dose of oxygen to the waste products that are trapped in our bodies so that they can be expelled.
Flooding the body with oxygen flushes the toxic waste out, bringing about a cleaning reaction. You may feel slightly unwell whilst this happens but then you will get your energy back and a clear consciousness with it.
To combat the invasion of the body from anaerobic, this simply means ‘ that which can’t live in oxygen’, microbes and organisms such as bacterias, fungus, virus, pathogens (i.e. cancer, HIV, flu, multiple sclerosis, common cold…) you should flood the body with oxygen safely and keep it flooded to saturation. The cleansing effect of the ozone will sterilise your body’s water and all bacteria, fungus, viruses, and pathogens, once surrounded with the oxygen, will get expelled.
Ed McCabe to conclude said: “Could this be the answer to all diseases?”
The real cures are natural
dreamstime.com
The real cures are natural
Modern medicine has clearly failed… we are sicker than ever
This reminds me of a statement another Doctor whose advice I value. Dr Peter Glidden states that, “all disease is cell disease - it isn’t because you have breasts that you get breast cancer, or own a prostate that you have prostate cancer” and to me this makes perfect sense and complements Ed McCabe’s ozone therapy.
Therefore, why wouldn’t we be considering such therapy especially when we are faced with such hard facts as the following figures from the USA? Between 1990-2000, 7.8 million people died from properly administered medicine. That is more deaths than is caused by the US military. Also in the USA, 150,000 people a year will die from medical blunders.
According to Doctor Peter Glidden, chemotherapy is 97% ineffective but hugely profitable for the pharmaceutical industry. Allopathic medicine has failed for 200 years to come up with cures for asthma, arthritis, depression, heartburn, cancer etc…
With this in mind, and with general distrust of the medical profession, caused by nothing more than bad experience, I gave the ozone generator a go. I bought a generator for around £60 on Ebay; a real bargain.
Initially, I was not particularly blown over by the smell but I got used to it and used it, for 5 minutes or more every 2 hours, for a couple of months with no particular use other than for ambient breathing. But in December, a pain in my stomach region which has been nagging me for a few weeks, was getting gradually worse; enough for me to moan about it all the time. I didn’t really know what it could be, but my prime suspect was coffee. Twelve years earlier, my husband had suffered an ulcer badly enough to visit the quack and got a heavy dose of antibiotics. For him it was clear that I had the same symptoms. As far as I was concerned I was not going to visit the quack, not yet anyway! With a name to my complaint, and bent in half with pain, I Googled ‘ulcer and ozone’. I clicked on:
As per the advice on the comment from the above link, I poured myself a pint of distilled water and ozonated it for 10 minutes, drank it and I kid you not, within 10 minutes the pain was gone, completely gone, and has never returned since. From then on I have been drinking at least a pint of ozonated water a day, sometimes more, and I really feel more focused, and weirdly I have noticed that my handwriting is neater when the generator is on! Even though to begin with the taste of ozonated water isn’t exactly pleasant, I would not let that stop anyone; it is so well worth it.
I got a generator for my parents. Being both in their mid to late 70’s, they qualify as old school. I didn’t think they would go for it that easily, but as luck would have it, when my dad was young, his first job was in an electrical shop, which unbelievably used to sell ozone generators, only to the wealthy and for their health improvement. The fact that he had seen if for himself and heard good feedback about this machine made my job to convince them a lot easier. Pretty quickly they also felt the benefits. I could also see the improvements in them. They are taking far too many medications and the side effects are horrendous. I got them to drink as much of the ozonated water as possible and they haven’t had any cold of flu yet this year, my mum is more coherent and they both seem happier.
Andrew Wakefield - An honest doctor
Andrew Wakefield
Andrew Wakefield - An honest doctor
Dr. Wakefield was crucified by the medical establishment for doing his job
Obviously, none of what is written above should be construed as medical advice, God forbid! And the ozone didn’t cure me of my ulcer! Only a medical doctor can cure! They own the word. My ulcer just decided to move on as soon as the ozone moved in.
I really feel for that retired GP and the way he has been treated, which is not uncommon for those that oppose the medical establishment (remember Andrew Wakefield?).
Ian R Crane starts his talk on Codex Alimentarius, (the global control and ‘poisoning’ of our food, supplements… Video available on Youtube) with this comment:
‘Oh don’t be so stupid they’re not going to do anything like that… and I said, well… believe it or not that’s exactly what they want you to think…’
It is pretty clear to me that these days, trusting blindly anyone with anything, especially with regards to our health, is nothing short of suicidal, no matter how much of a slow process this suicide will be. This includes, but is not limited to, the water we drink, the food we ingest, the supplements we swallow, the drugs we are administered and the air we breathe.
Do your own research. You’ll be amazed at what you’ll discover, but dig deep.
The trolls are busy and they get EU funding. But that’s another issue.
Thank you Judy and Des!

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

Are we the Judean People’s Front or the People’s Front of Judea?

“We should be united against the common enemy"

I know, like many others, that things are very wrong and that the government, far from being part of the solution, is seemingly, the cause of the problem.
I and most others don’t need convincing that things need to be done urgently.
Just under a year ago, I found out that there are an endless number of groups, movers and shakers, freeman movements and the like, providing great information, to expose the problems we’re facing. There are equally as many groups offering solutions. Those groups of intelligent, well researched and well-meaning people are fighting tooth and nail to convince us, thesheeple', to join their solution. I can understand their frustration when all they get in return is what seems like apathy; after all, they are so convinced they have the answer to our problems. They are most likely right. So are the other groups. Could it be that herein lies the problem?
Far from being apathetic, most of us will listen to those small groups and their ‘leaders’ very carefully. We, for the majority, agree their product is good, but just like when you go to test drive a VW, in the back of your mind you know you also need to have a go in an Audi. Both are good. Eventually you’ll end up keeping your old car because most of the time it still works.
Could too much choice be detrimental?
It has been said that, to overthrow the current government of any country, all that is needed is for 10% of the population to participate.
What if it could be done with less?
We have established that we need numbers, after all, might is right. The numbers are there but people are constantly being pulled from one worthy direction towards another. We hear such things as “Our group is better than that group because we really seriously look at using the existing system” or We believe the only way is going back to common law”; all of which have their merits when you are new to this and become aware that change is paramount.
Equally, when you don’t have the time and/or the brain power to analyse law dictionaries and books published over 200 years ago, we the 'sheeple' know that we will eventually have to put our faith into credible groups.
But which ones?
United against the common enemy
Roger Hayes had over 400 people turning up at one meeting in Stoke on Trent. How many would have turned up in London, Liverpool or Manchester? John Harris can fill up rooms in a blink of an eye. The UK Column has over 6,000 subscribers. Chunky Mark has over 30,000. Christopher Spivey claims millions of hits each month on his website. The People’s Voice was recently launched and has already over 12,000 subscribers. How about all of those at The Community Press Group and its members?
I understand that many of the same people will be following one or more of those guys, but not all, and there are many more groups, sites, radio and TV channels to name and many more potentially ‘awake’ subscribers to harvest.
Can you imagine the numbers of followers that would make if from this petrie dish became a group of united and focused ‘leaders’?
In the meantime, some groups are writing and rewriting Charters and Human Rights declarations with a twist of Magna Carta and a pinch of the Bill of Rights. Would it be insolent to call this re-inventing the wheel?
The principle of common law worked for centuries. The reason things don’t work anymore is because we the 'sheeple', whilst we were too busy not paying attention, let corruption take over. Corrupt people create unnecessary laws, statutes, legislation, rules and regulations to cage us into a common-sense voided submission.
Going back to the basic rules which worked so well for previous generations may be an easier way to go about things and might also be an easier approach to sell to most of us.
Those ‘born leaders’, are seemingly, working individually of each other, trying tirelessly to unite us. Realistically, how is this going to work? As ‘leaders’, they need to work together if they want to have any chance at uniting those of us that are‘awake’. Blaming people who are not prepared to blindly follow is just not going to cut it, nor is knocking David Icke or Alex Jones, mocking the Freemen, or those who want to play the system at their own games.
I have heard on numerous occasions ‘awake people slagging off these and other well known ‘truthers'. Time is of the essence, and digging at each other over matters we could all agree on isn’t terribly constructive. Let’s face it we won’t agree on everything, all of the time.
Joining new ‘parties / unions / groups / junta / co-operatives’, ‘taking over local governments and / or government all together’ takes some getting used to, as far as following and supporting ideas. It is not easy to just choose a camp. At the moment in the UK we have a coalition government; even those heartless barstewards, know that you have to unite to conquer. It makes it much easier for them to divide us when they are united!
Can those groups achieve what they want independently of each other?
SPLITTERS!
Could they be too overprotective of ‘their’ ideas? I’d like to think that ego has nothing to do with it. It would just be counter-productive. If that was the case we would be much better off with just getting rid of government with no other solution for the time being than dispersing our energy in many directions.
The Belgian people had no government for almost 2 years and the country is still there, the people survived it just fine. Sadly, now they have to suffer a gang of corporate minions, but don’t we all…
To all the freedom and justice ‘leaders’ out there, rest assured that most of us already admire your work, your determination, your passion and your knowledge that you have shared selflessly. We are all ready to follow your guidance and have never been so determined to join something better but you need to unite amongst yourselves to form something universally identifiable - make it good, make it big. Make it easier for all of us to help you along that campaign.
This movement needs to be bought by all, at every level. We are eager to participate and to sell it to our sleepy neighbours, our narrow-minded family, our dismissive friends and in the meantime we will, no doubt, keep tenaciously spreading our truths to the sleeping giant whenever an opportunity arises, but please, arm us with a common message coming from a strong, united, and most of all, credible leadership with a clearly identifiable theme, message and cause.
Not all of us are natural ‘leaders’ - the rest of us, the ‘awake sheeple’ are however right beside you and ready for a non-violent and peaceful uprising.


Sunday, 9 February 2014

Bloody French!

From French comedians, to French footballers in England... Free speech and freedom of expression are under attack

Nicolas Anelka with French comedian Dieudonne giving the Quenelle gesture... So what?
What's so offensive about this?
Nicolas Anelka with French 
comedian Dieudonne giving 
the Quenelle gesture... So what?
Over the Christmas holidays we went to Brittany, France.
Something happened there that might also affect us here in the UK and you’ll have to hang on right to the end to find out what it could be. Nothing could have prepared us for what happened over those 2 weeks. A crime seemingly of the worse sort… humour.
Humour on the sick and the healthy, the smoker, the alcoholic, the poor, the rich (watch out), the blacks, whites, yellows, males, females, kids, young, old, fat, thin, rural folks and city dwellers, French, Brits, Arabs, Spanish, Jews… silence!
What did I just say? Ooops, sorry, have I gone that little bit too far?
Well, it would appear that Mr Dieudonné, a 50% Breton French, 50% Cameroonian comedian, had just done that. Before I go any further, prior to this debacle worthy of a high national security alert, I had never heard any of his shows or gigs. I had onl seen his name in passing on the Youtube Channel of the great Laurent Louis, Member of the Belgium Chamber of Representatives (interestingly enough this man is against illegal wars and political corruption in the parliament; an all round really decent guy. I encourage anyone who has given up on politicians to check
him out just to see that there is a decent one and he is in Belgium! I would also encourage you check the video link below, it has english subtitles).
We have established that I had not heard of the guy, and there is a really good reason for that.
He has been censored from the French media for the last ten years or so
You’d think he had raped an entire nunnery. The main stream media in France, which are probably equally as bad as the media in the UK, were on a roll with the Dieudonné Scandal. What an over reaction of epic proportion!
Then, as if that wasn’t enough, Anelka does the celebratory ‘Quenelle’, or so my son tells me. It is confirmed by the ‘Journal de 20 Heures’ (evening news), that Nicolas Anelka, the West Bromwich Albion striker, made a hand signal on the pitch, which is believed by some to be an anti-semitic gesture or an ‘inverted nazi salute’, whatever that means. This too was news to me. I thought Anelka had retired back to France years ago and this was how I found out that he lives only just down the road.
For clarification, according to Dieudonné, the ‘Quenelle’ is nothing more than an anti-establishment gesture which he has been employing for the last 10 years.
So why is it a big deal now? Perhaps they were holding on to it until the right opportunity?
I also wonder who it was who suddenly decided that this gesture is an inverted Nazi salute? Is it any more so than the standard military salute? Or waving good-bye from your front porch?
Anyway, it was Anelka’s ‘quenelle’ that triggered it for me. Unlike most of the material I have since read from the UK press, I did some research on this and it was far from being a mammoth task; they should all try it sometimes!
I started to investigate the ‘offending’ videos further on Youtube.
Don’t get me wrong, my investigation didn’t spring up with swastikas and fake moustaches; with all that fuss I was almost expecting that.
To this day, and this is my opinion, I have yet to find anything that anyone could find deliberately offensive. Of course, as far as humour is concerned, if anything, I found Dieudonné quite funny, very touching too, but most of all he has a serious message, very serious. Dare I say that he is not keen on the New World Order B*** S***? He believes the governments of France, Europe and United States are not working for the good of the people, and that corruption is widespread. He blames the Zionists to a large extent and the bankers. He talks about the falsification of history. He is an Anti-ZIONIST.
We know of course, Anti-Zionism has nothing to do with Anti-Semitism
Incidentally, a Semite is a member of any of the peoples who speak or spoke a Semitic language, including, and in particular, Jews and Arabs. Interesting no? Thanks wiki!
Dieudonné has a great sketch where he tackles the cancer issue. It is funny, but also very true. He describes very accurately the money making machine that the modern health system has become, and he does it brilliantly.
Hunting for further evidence I stumbled upon a comment he had made about Patrick Cohen “…you see when I hear Patrick Cohen, I say to myself, you see, about the gas chambers… Pity”. OK, so that is controversial at best. DEFCON 1 it is not!
Who is Patrick Cohen?
I checked some Youtube videos where he was invited to join a debate on the panel of Frederic Taddeï’s French television show. There, I learn that Cohen has insulted Dieudonné and called him a psychiatric case and a sick brain. He was also very aggressive toward the host Frederic Taddeï (1), who is a fervent advocate for free speech and quite brilliant. For the last decade, he has been the only one brave enough to give Dieudonné a voice on his late night show. In the episode which is linked below, Cohen was not even slightly embarrassed to say a clear and loud ‘NON! ’when one of the panellists asked him if he thought people should have the choice to think as they wished. Patrick Cohen made me feel nauseous.
It took me a few days to go through more videos of Dieudonné and my verdict is that there was nothing anti-semitic or intentionally racist, no material designed to hurt anyone inparticular or in general in his work.
Despite the lack of evidence the LICRA, (League Against Racism and Anti- Semitism) which is the equivalent of the Anti-Defamation League, is pressing charges against Dieudonné for Anti-Semitic remarks, and of course this has now escalated so much so that Manuel Valls, the current French Minister of Interior has how become involved. According to him, Dieudonné’s ‘hate speech’ has gone on for too long and gone too far. He must be shut down; his theatre, bank accounts, tour venues, travelling freedom, the whole lot.
They are trying to stop this guy from working
Up until 10 years ago he was complying, and an active member of the French Anti-Racist group ‘SOS Racisme’, but then he ‘woke up’. He realised the depth of the corruption and deception and so he started to spread the truth.
Here lies the real issue.
The French people know that and the censorship is backfiring. Dieunonné’s popularity is skyrocketing amongst all creeds and cultures, and that includes amongst the Jewsish community.
Funnily enough, and with a fair amount of hypocrisy, in September 2012, when the French satirical magazine 'Charlie Hebdo' published cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, in defiance of the recent worldwide Muslim protests, French Muslim leaders called for calm after a meeting with Interior Minister Manuel Valls over the publication of pictures. "We expressed to the Minister the indignation and the anger of Muslims following a series of provocations. We have also told the minister of our quiet and serene spirit. They will not respond to provocation {and} they won't give in to
provocation.”
Mr Valls then took the opportunity to explain that "Freedom of speech is a fundamental freedom and that the freedom to caricature is part of that fundamental right. That can shock some people. That is the case. And the courts are there for those who want to use them.” (IBTime UK)
So lets be clear, freedom of speech is not permitted in humour about Jewish people but when the joke is directed at the Muslim people it's just tough luck for them
If I may, I would like to add, just in passing, that a Criminal trial involving senior public figures, involved in violent peadophile acts, snuff movies, etc. was due to start in Draguignan, France, on the 9th January 2014. Key members of the French government ignored the warnings and files sent by the family of some of the victims, protecting in essence the perpetrators. For those key members of the government, the Dieudonné ‘scandal’ would have been the perfect gift.
What a brilliant distraction and not dissimilar to the distraction of the unfortunate, but unusually ultra mediatised disappearance of Madeleine McCann whilst the UK’s Prime Minister was possibly surrendering his country’s sovereignty to the EU with his signature on the Lisbon treaty.
Distraction can manifest in many shapes and sizes
Imagine for one moment that the moon landing was organised to distract the world from the terrible mess which the US found itself in over in Vietnam? I can think of so many of those distractions over the years… But I am digressing slightly.
Now, moving back to this fair and green land. Today I saw several people posting on Facebook about Katie Hopkins. Some were moaning and raging, but some were also joking and laughing.
For my own wellbeing and general sanity I don’t watch or read any celebrity material but I think I get the gist of the matter, and according to the good people of Facebook Katie Hopkins is a vile individual who spits spiteful comments from her evil yobbish mouth. I am sure that is fair enough. I would even say that it is insane that such drivel further pollutes the media airwaves, enticing tension, resentment and hatred.
Katie Hopkins... mainstream media mouthpiece or just ignorant?
cage8.com
Katie Hopkins... mainstream media mouthpiece or just ignorant?
Where do these talking heads come from?
But all this considered, the anger didn’t stop there. I believe what happened next was an over reaction, in the shape of a petition to ‘Not allow anymore airtime or column writing of the abuse she speaks’ on (ironically) www.change.org.
The petition claims:-
"It's important, because she causes so much anger, resentment, hate and vulgarity in people and its offensive and should be chargeable as an offence to the criminal court system. SHE SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO GET AWAY WITH IT. Her disgusting attitude towards we the people is appalling and it's not right she can get away with so much abuse. It's beyond a joke and something has to be done."
Astounding, is it not?
Here’s a quote:-
“Hypocrites get offended by the truth.”
By Jess C. Scott. I don’t know this person but it sounds about right.
After seeing what has been happening in France, the country of the 'Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen', surrouding the blatant assault on the freed speech of a comedian, who merely decided to speak the truth, then seeing it is cross pollinating like some crazed GMO crop to the UK to contaminate Nicolas Anelka’s freedom of expression, I am starting to wonder if we are not seeing a much more sinister agenda, aimed at the suppression of our freedom of expression and free thought, being engineered by our government.
What if the government sponsored media were using Katie Hopkins as their mouthpiece in order to provoke so much anger and indignation, ensuring that it was widely spread, so that it would lead to the public demanding a limitation on everyone’s freedom of speech? Government would just love that!
Our MPs have only just recently voted in favour a new gagging law (2). Don’t you think we have been gagged enough?
In France, the government seem to take exception if the people want to go to shows they have paid for to have a laugh for a couple of hours. In the UK a footballer is no longer allowed to show a sign of support to his friend with a rebellious gesture. However, should we be prepared to willingly fall into the trap of giving up our rights because of this? This is serious and we won’t miss these rights until we don’t have them any more.
As Orwell allegedly said “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”
So long as they don’t have to listen, I don’t see what the problem is.
WAKE UP and Quenelle!
References:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQJ73vtakkM - Laurent Louis subtitled
1.Frederic Taddeï’s position on public tv is now compromised.
Frédéric Taddeï et Patrick Cohen sur le plateau de "C à vous" - 12 Mars 2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1kAvBV4z_gc -France Closes Embassies in Muslim Countries
2.What is the Gagging Law? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDtFoPWBoLc